Vampire fiction wave almost over: Gaiman
The current wave of vampire fiction is almost over and rightly so, English author Neil Gaiman opines in a brief interview with Entertainment Weekly.
“Vampires go in waves, and it kind of feels like we’re now finishing a vampire wave, because at the point where they’re everywhere it’s probably time to go back underground for another 20 years or another 25 years,” states Gaiman. At this point the interviewer asks him if society has reached “saturation point” for vampire fiction.
“I think so,” he adds, “and it definitely sort of feels like classical vampires have been around enough that if they could go back in their coffins 25 years and come out the next time as something really different, that would be cool.”
Adds Gaiman later on his blog:
“(And note that I’m not saying there’s anything bad about vampires, quite the opposite. Just that in a world in which a dozen people immediately write to me on Twitter to point out that I’ve got it wrong, as they are all writing Vampire stories, in which Vampires are now everywhere, is a world in which High Vampire Season is coming to an end). You shouldn’t be glutted with vampires: they should be a spice, not a food group.”
There is no doubt that the popularity of fiction, particularly romantic fiction, utilising vampires in modern day life has increased dramatically over the past few years; the popularity of Stephanie Meyer’s Twilight series being just the most obvious example. And of course Joss Whedon’s Buffy and Angel series did much to bring vampire ideas back into the popular consciousness.
There are Facebook books devoted to Meyer fans trying to find the next vampire romance book series, and it’s common in mainstream book stores to see one or another series of books advertised as being “the next Twilight“. In fact, some stores have whole shelves of such series.
Interestingly, alongside the Gaiman story, Entertainment Weekly is also running an interview with former head of Warner Books Larry Kirschbaum, who says he was skeptical about Twilight when Meyer was first signed:
“I called the editor and said basically, ‘Are you crazy? This is a first author, no platform, just a housewife, books about vampires. Do people really want to read that?”
Commentary
I don’t think we’ve reached saturation point yet, and in fact I think we’ve still got a fair way to go, judging by how interested Meyer fans are in the vampire romance genre, and how many new authors are focusing on it. I’m hoping, though, that that focus will throw up some real literary gems that will stand the test of time, along with the pulp.
5 Responses to Vampire fiction wave almost over: Gaiman
Most debated
- Towers of Midnight: Wheel of Time book 13 (269)
- Dune twitterers ridicule Kevin J. Anderson (61)
- Asimov estate authorises I, Robot sequels (61)
- New Hitchhiker’s Guide book “not very funny” (46)
- How good are the new Dune books? (42)
- Brent Weeks’ next book: Black Prism (30)
- Iain Banks’ Transition gets mixed reviews (27)
- Are science fiction/fantasy writers insane? (19)
- Next Wheel of Time book: Read chapter one (19)
- Brandon Sanderson’s The Way of Kings: Review (19)
Subscribe
Popular topics
a dance with dragons a song of ice and fire australia brandon sanderson dune fantasy forever peace frank herbert george r. r. martin grrm guy gavriel kay haruki murakami iain m. banks janny wurts joe abercrombie joe haldeman karen miller kevin j. anderson kim stanley robinson mistborn neil gaiman neuromancer patrick rothfuss review robert jordan robin hobb science fiction stephanie meyer the fionavar tapestry the forever war the gathering storm the name of the wind the prodigal mage the summer tree the wheel of time the wise man's fear tor twilight twitter uk ursula k. le guin vampire video wheel of time william gibsonLatest posts
- Keeping the Door shuttered
- Patrick Rothfuss’ The Wise Man’s Fear: Review
- A Dance with Dragons is *really* complete
- Review: Iain M. Banks’ The Player of Games
- Guy Gavriel Kay’s Under Heaven: Review
- George R. R. Martin hates A Dance With Dragons delay too
- Early reviews of The Wise Man’s Fear are positive
- Review: Iain M. Banks’ Consider Phlebas
- Review: Hannu Rajaniemi’s The Quantum Thief
- Towers of Midnight: Review
- Peter V. Brett’s The Painted Man: Review
- Brandon Sanderson’s The Way of Kings: Review
- The Left Hand of God: Review
- Robin Hobb’s Dragon Haven: Review
- Gardens of the Moon: Review












What this fails to mention is how poorly written, executed and otherwise conceived the majority of this vampire fiction is. Especially Twilight. I wouldn’t mind the trend if the books were half decent but they’re all such wastes of paper.
I don’t know what circles this writer travels in but he is so wrong. There are numerous people I know of writing these books. They may or may not be published but many nowadays get published by small publishers or self-publish. They may not get on the best sellers list but via certain small publishers some get picked up for films. Look at the movie Day Breakers. I don’t know why people pick on Stephanie Meyers…that movie was horrible. I don’t know if there was a book behind it but I didn’t take the time to find out. Not all who have degrees in creative writing and associated fields feel the same way about her books as far as quality. I know I have talked to them. It isn’t so much about the quality of the writing because the average person who reads horror/fantasy will not notice things an English teacher might notice. It is for entertainment. It is not a college thesis. I think some of the adults going on about this are as bad as the teens who are doing things because of the movies…they all should know better. There is nothing wrong with Twilight and I am a senior who has been writing for years. If you haven’t read all the books or at least watched the movies, you should not be critiquing them, because then it is just a matter of interest. If people aren’t interested in these stories I think that is fine, many don’t like horror tales but its also okay if others do like the movies and books. I am sure she is laughing all the way to the bank. I think she has been very gracious about all the rude people on the internet.
I SHALL AGREE WITH MR.LEMAY CONCERNING TO THE FACT THAT VAMPIRES WILL INVEVITABLY DISAPPEAR AND REMAIN FAR FROM NOVELS FOR A BUNCH OF YEARS. EVERY TOPIC THAT IS MASSIVE EXPLOITED TURNS OUT TO BECOME OLD FASHIONED AND CORNY. SO AFTER SOME TIME PEOPLE WILL TEND TO LAUGH AT YOUR FACE WHEN U MENTION VAMPIRES!
Please, God, let Gaiman be right and Lemay be wrong. I have had it up to HERE with vampires *indicates a point three miles above head*
Heh I think most people have — I certainly have!