<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Keeping the Door &#187; red mars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.keepingthedoor.com/tag/red-mars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.keepingthedoor.com</link>
	<description>All you can eat sci-fi and fantasy books</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 13:25:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Kim Stanley Robinson slams Booker &#8216;ignorance&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.keepingthedoor.com/2009/09/20/kim-stanley-robinson-slams-booker-ignorance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.keepingthedoor.com/2009/09/20/kim-stanley-robinson-slams-booker-ignorance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 04:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Renai LeMay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blue mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[booker prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kim stanley robinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red mars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepingthedoor.com/?p=612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Says they're ignoring British sci-fi masters.


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.keepingthedoor.com/2009/10/18/guy-gavriel-kay-mocks-booker-judges-idiocy/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Guy Gavriel Kay mocks Booker judge&#8217;s &#8216;idiocy&#8217;'>Guy Gavriel Kay mocks Booker judge&#8217;s &#8216;idiocy&#8217;</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.keepingthedoor.com/2009/11/17/ksr-slams-republican-climate-denial/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: KSR slams Republican climate &#8216;denial&#8217;'>KSR slams Republican climate &#8216;denial&#8217;</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.keepingthedoor.com/2009/08/24/charles-stross-slams-tainted-us-politics/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Charles Stross slams &#8216;tainted&#8217; US politics'>Charles Stross slams &#8216;tainted&#8217; US politics</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_613" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 260px"><a href="http://www.keepingthedoor.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/ksrheadshot.jpg"><img src="http://www.keepingthedoor.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/ksrheadshot.jpg" alt="Kim Stanley Robinson" title="ksrheadshot" width="250" height="318" class="size-full wp-image-613" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Kim Stanley Robinson</p></div>
<p>American sci-fi author <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Stanley_Robinson">Kim Stanley Robinson</a> has slammed the judges of the well-known <a href="http://www.themanbookerprize.com">Man Booker Prize</a>, saying they hand out the coveted award “in ignorance”, passing over science fiction books he considers to be “the best British literature of our time”.</p>
<p>The prize is awarded to the best novel each year written by a citizen of the British Commonwealth and has a 50,000 pound prize. Earlier this month, <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-20517-Austin-Literature-Examiner~y2009m9d9-Man-Booker-shortlist-announced">the shortlist for the prize was announced</a>, but no science fiction books were to be found on it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20327263.200-science-fiction-the-stories-of-now.html?full=true">In a scathing article published by <em>New Scientist</em> online last week</a>, Robinson, best-known for his terraforming Mars trilogy (<em>Red Mars</em>, <em>Green Mars</em> and <em>Blue Mars</em>), said the Booker Prize tended to focus on historical novels instead of giving at least some credibility to what he considered to be the literature of here and now today: Science fiction:</p>
<p><span id="more-612"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Sometimes these are fine historical novels …  But working, like all of us, in the rain shadow of the great modernists, they tend to do the same things the modernists did in smaller ways. A good new novel about the first world war, for instance, is still not going to tell us more than Parade&#8217;s End by Ford Madox Ford. More importantly, these novels are not about now in the way science fiction is.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>(via <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/sep/18/science-fiction-booker-prize"><em>The Guardian</em></a>, <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kim_Stanley_Robinson_1_Eaton_2008-05-17.png">image by AllyUnion</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.keepingthedoor.com/2009/09/20/kim-stanley-robinson-slams-booker-ignorance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
